I’ve read, and re-read Immigrationrhetoric disconnected from reality, and its counter article Amnesties reward law-breaking and have
to say both are disappointing. If this is the best or popular editorial writers
you have than USA Today needs to clean house starting with these two. My
Primary article for discussion for this week is the first article, Immigration rhetoric disconnected from
reality, in which the unknown author writes about more about defending Gov.
Perry than actual illegal immigration. The article first starts off as Gov. Perry
knowing what “real-world immigration” issues are, because Texas shares a border
with Mexico. Our unknown author states “Perry…
runs a state with a 1,200-mile border with Mexico… he has to wrestle with
real-world immigration issues, so when he says building a fence along the
entire border is a dumb idea, it's worth listening” than uses this to jump
to an issue, of rather illegal immigrants should pay “in-state” or “out-of-state”
tuition. Illegal Immigration is a hot
button topic in this country and what better time to discuss it than now. Aside
from defending our Governor, let’s look at what is reported here. On the
subject of the border-fence this opinion piece says “focus heavily on areas where crossers actually go” an idea I can
get behind if a fence is what our State wants. Why spend money on areas where
there are no crossings? A fence where heavy traffic of immigrants enter the US
makes more sense. On to the second point, this brings up college tuition.
Should immigrants pay in-state tuition? Gov. Perry would like for illegal
immigrants to pay in-state tuition if they make it to higher education levels.
Even the unknown author states “Texas, and the nation, are better off if
they're educated and productive members of society.” I do agree that educated
citizens would leave this nation better off. As for in-state tuition, for
immigrants, I’m against. Purely from the standpoint that Gov. Perry, to me,
assumes that Texas Universities are the place to be. UT Austin charges $30,000
for out-of-state and $8000 for in-state tuition. My former school, Concordia,
charges both in-state and out-of-state near $20,000. My friend Ashleigh, who
attends Baylor, is charged, $28,000, the same as out-of-state tuition. Another
friend of mine, Marcos, attends Texas State, his tuition is $6000, half of out-of-state
tuition. Basically in-state tuition, only effects those who attend public
universities, for private universities, tuition is nearly the same. I know I live in Austin, but Austin, you need
to realize that UT is not the only University in town, you just happen to be
the biggest. For immigrants wanting to attend a private university this
issue of tuition becomes a non-factor. Furthermore taken from Hispanic Magazine.com, the number
one school for Hispanics was Princeton University. From Hispanic Outlook.com
the number one university was, Florida International University.(I'm aware that Outlook cited Texas schools are schools for Hispanics) With that
information in-State tuition for immigrants, illegal or legal, is not relevant on the basis that Texas Schools are the only schools Hispanics attend.
*College Tuition Here (In the search bar type in a university, click the tab under "Cost")
No comments:
Post a Comment